A. MyLikes is word-of-mouth advertising platform that connects advertisers with influencers on the web. Influencers can spread the word and earn money.Here you'll connect campaigns i.e ads to your twitter/facebook accounts and when people click the links.
Q. Is it legit?
A. Yes, it is.Search google if you dont believe me.I cant blog here.
Q.How do we make money?
A."Click Exchange".And for this we have made a Palringo group "Mylikes"
Q.What do we need to do?
A. 1) dwnload palringo and Install it.
2) Signup on Mylikes.com
3) Now join this group "Mylikes"
4)Exchange links with people online(without http://)
5) Open Chrome in Incognito window.
6) Go to their profile and click the links with -AD at their end
Here is a method to delete any facebook profile or account. It works 100%. But its just for educational purpose. So don't use it on anyone. Once Deleted Profile can never be recovered. Use wisely.
WHAT ALL U NEED ?
1. Victim's profile link ( you can get it easily ) 2. His/Her Email which he/she uses to sign in 3. His/Her birth date which he/she has used in the profile 4. Make an Email ID on gmail or yahoo with the first name and last name same as on victim's facebook profile.
2. Enter details. In the place of ' email address where you can be contacted ' enter the fake email u created.
3. you will get a mail on that ID in which facebook people will ask your problem. Reply to them that you are XYZ( victim's name ) and you cant access your facebook account. Also you have lost access to your Email Address associated with the account. You dont know what to do now. The hacker is coming online regularly and using your account. If the victim is a girl also write ' I am a girl and it poses threat to my social life ' and write anything you want that could make them take action. ( no need though in 100 % cases they delete the account )
4. After 2-3 days youu will get a reply. They will again ask you that you have access to your associated Email or not? Reply them that you still don't have access to it. And repeat what all you wrote in first mail.
5. Next Day or Same Day you will get an Email that your account is disabled.
Most experts agree: The Internet improves social relations and will continue to do so over the next decade. And you thought the machines were going to rise up and murder us all.
The Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project and Elon University’s Imagining the Internet Center just released their fourth “Future of the Internet” survey, the topic of which was “The Future of Social Relations.” The opt-in study, which tapped 895 tech stakeholders and critics, essentially presented respondents with two differing world views:
“In 2020, when I look at the big picture and consider my personal friendships, marriage and other relationships, I see that the internet has mostly been a positive force on my social world. And this will only grow more true in the future. ”
and…
“In 2020, when I look at the big picture and consider my personal friendships, marriage and other relationships, I see that the internet has mostly been a negative force on my social world. And this will only grow more true in the future. ”
They then chose one viewpoint, elaborated as to why they chose that stance, as well as pontificated on the subject more generally. The results are pretty interesting.
As you can see from the above graphic, 85% think that their lives have been improved by the web, and that this theme will continue over the course of the next decade. The graphic shows two different groups: 371 long-time experts who regularly participate in the surveys, and the entire survey group, which includes other experts.
In looking at these results it’s important to take them with a grain of salt, as they come from people who are mostly web enthusiasts. According to Pew, “50% have been using the Internet since 1992 or earlier, with 11% actively involved online since 1982 or earlier. When asked for their primary area of Internet interest, 15% of the survey participants identified themselves as research scientists; 14% as business leaders or entrepreneurs; 12% as consultants or futurists, 12% as authors, editors or journalists; 9% as technology developers or administrators; 7% as advocates or activist users; 3% as pioneers or originators; 2% as legislators, politicians or lawyers; and 25% specified their primary area of interest as ‘other.’”
Respondents include everyone from Craig Newmark, the founder of Craigslist, to folks from top universities and government agencies, as well as companies like Google, Microsoft, Cisco Systems, Yahoo, Intel, IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Ericsson Research, Nokia and The New York Times.
Still, Pew provided a myriad of more descriptive responses from those surveyed that cast an interesting light on the findings. While many cited positive experiences with the web — such as meeting spouses, fostering relationships with distant relatives and cutting the costs of communication — many also questioned the effects of the web on society. Think loss of privacy, deep relationships and burgeoning intolerance (not to mention the rise of Justin Bieber — my own contribution). Here’s a selection of quotes from survey respondents that we found most interesting. Take a moment and let us know in the comments: How do you think the web is affecting our social relations?
“The net is about people connecting online, for commerce, politics, and personally, and we already see that enhances real-life relationships. Location-based social networking, in particular, will be a big part of our lives.” —Craig Newmark, founder and customer- service representative, Craigslist, former software engineer and programmer at companies such as JustInTime Solutions, Bank of America and IBM
“If – and I believe this will happen eventually – the tendency to make remarks and adopt positions you would never consider in person can be overcome, online society stands a very real chance of taking interpersonal relationships to a level never before possible. Balancing out the anonymity and lack of physical contact is the ability to mask a plethora of medical and psychological conditions that until now have proven serious handicaps to social interaction. No one stutters or stammers on Twitter.” —Robert G. Ferrell, information systems security professional, US government, former systems security specialist, National Business Center, US Department of the Interior
“Fifty years ago emigrants left their family and friends behind. Now people who move from one country to another simply enlarge their social networks, building truly global communities.” —Hal Varian, chief economist of Google and on the faculty at the University of California-Berkeley
“The Internet helps me maintain contact with a greater number of people. But it also makes it easier for me to retreat within a form-fitted political, religious, or social landscape. It’s when we find ways to work with people with whom we disagree that society progresses. The internet makes it easier for me to avoid disagreement and compromise and encourages me to become more strident and polarized in my views. That’s a problem.” —Tim Marema, vice president of the Center for Rural Strategies
“The technology is simply as good or bad as human nature. One has only to look at the hype around #iranelection to see the capacity for giddy optimism to be supplanted by calculated abuse of power. The Internet can be a positive force for creating reinforcing social connections, and a negative for abuse of civil liberties and increasing polarization of opinion.” —Perry Hewitt, director of digital communications and communications services at Harvard University
Steve Radick is a communications consultant with Booz Allen Hamilton, a global technology and strategy consulting firm. He has worked with clients from across the U.S. government to develop and implement strategic communications plans and campaigns.
There has been plenty of discussion about how governments are using social media to engage with the general public and open up their vast amounts of data to collaborators. The interagency collaboration occurring behind government firewalls using wikis and blogs is also well-publicized. A topic that’s received less attention are the ways that social media and the principles of openness, collaboration, and authenticity are transforming how the government does business. How is social media changing the government contracting process? That’s the $500 billion+ question.
The world of contracting is one of the most important, complex, and least transparent within our Federal Government. From 100-page Request for Proposals (RFPs) to GSA schedules to organizational conflicts of interest to non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), the environment has long discouraged real discourse in favor of strict rules, processes, and policies. Too many companies of all sizes are frustrated and overwhelmed by the intricacies and red tape connected to doing business with the government.
But social media has brought about some positive changes. Here are three important ways it’s done so.
1. Getting Inside the “Black Box”
As Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan put it, “bureaucracy is the ultimate black box of government … [it] is impervious to full public understanding, much less control.”
Five years ago, if a junior consultant wanted to talk with someone like Linda Cureton, NASA’s Chief Information Officer, about Spacebook, he would have to:
Brief his manager on why he wants to talk with her
Discuss his business objectives for the meeting
Get his manager to contact a senior manager within the NASA account team and schedule a meeting with him/her to discuss intentions
Discuss his business objectives with him/her
Hope that this person would then have the time to reach out to Linda’s assistant to get on her calendar
Attend the meeting with a NASA account representative (because a junior consultant couldn’t go by himself)
Those are six steps of red tape, all for a quick follow-up conversation with an acquaintance from a networking event. Unfortunately, the culture of the government contracting industry was one where everything, including everyday conversations, was heavily controlled and regulated. Nevermind () if the conversation had nothing to do with a current procurement or new contract — it was just safer to avoid talking altogether.
Social media however, has allowed us access to this black box and the humans inside. According to a recent 2010 Federal Community Social Media study by Market Connections, 55% of respondents are using social media either formally or informally to communicate with their government audiences. I can now follow more than 30 government CIOs on Twitter, I can friend them on Facebook (), and I can comment directly on their blogs. What used to take six steps now takes one direct message: “Linda, I’ll be down at NASA HQ for a meeting today – would love to talk with you about Spacebook while I’m there if you’re available.”
For me, the tipping point came when potential clients started contacting me on Twitter () and my blog instead of calling the “official” points of contact listed on established org charts. Once we saw social media as a new way to actually conduct business, our legal and marketing teams went to work revising our communication and social media policies. While we’re still highly encouraged to involve the right people with the right expertise as we talk with our clients, the social networks of many of our junior employees are now rivaling the Rolodexes of some of our senior staff.
2. Smarter Bidding on Government Contracts
If you’ve ever done business with the Federal Government, you’ve probably encountered a process that is “challenging, complex, convoluted, and inconsistent,” and you’ve “encountered high barriers to entry, or didn’t get the communication you thought you needed or had to have.” That was the opening line of Mary Davie’s address at Tim O’Reilly’s Gov 2.0 Expo held in Washington, DC this past May. Davie is the Assistant Commissioner for the Office of Assisted Acquisition Services (AAS) in the GSA’s Federal Acquisition Service (FAS). Disclosure: I was on the Gov 2.0 Expo Program Committee.
Yet we all accepted these struggles as the norm because “that’s the way the government works.” Government contracting is a $500 billion a year industry, involving thousands of people, thousands of companies, and just as many rules and regulations. The complexity of this problem has been exacerbated as government agencies all interpret these rules and regulations differently.
That’s where the Better Buy Project comes in. Developed as a joint project of the National Academy of Public Administration and the American Council for Technology in conjunction with the GSA, the Better Buy Project implements Uservoice to create a public platform where anybody can submit, view, and comment on ideas to make the government acquisition process more collaborative and transparent.
One of the implementations is the Better Buy wiki where anyone can ask questions and help shape future procurements in a transparent manner. The GSA is using Twitter to update interested parties on the status of active procurements. The Better Buy blog allows the public, the government, small business, big companies — anyone — to get new perspectives and expert viewpoints on making the acquisition process more open and accessible.
3. Turning “Enemies” Into “Frenemies”
What if the Federal Government, industry, local governments, small business owners, concerned citizens, and academia worked collaboratively to solve some of our nation’s toughest problems? It’s happening in the government contracting industry.
Thanks to social media, the walls that guarded against leaks of proprietary data have given way to conferences, meetups, and webinars where most participants subscribe to the “rising tides lift all boats” theory. At these events and sites, contractors, government staffers, media, and interested citizens gather together to talk about everything from the challenges of implementing open government to how government can better collaborate on issues related to the Gulf Coast oil spill.
Larger and more complex contracts mean many former competitors have now become collaborators. Government contractors large and small have recognized that instead of waiting for proposals and information, they can now work together to help define those requirements, saving time, improving quality, and increasing transparency.
Looking Ahead
These benefits don’t come without risks though. Complex contracting rules and regulations still exist and still apply. The culture of collaboration among the contracting community at events like the Gov 2.0 Expo does not decrease competition in the industry, but rather increases the quality of competitive submissions for billion dollar government contracts. The wiki that the GSA is using to bring more transparency and collaboration to the federal procurement process is leaving ethics officers, contracting officers, project managers, lawyers and technical advisers grappling with how to adapt to these new open and transparent processes.
Despite how far we’ve come over the last five years, there is still a long way to go before doing business with the government is as easy as doing business in the private sector. The Federal IT Dashboard is a great start, but it’s just the tip of the iceberg. Data transparency doesn’t necessarily lead to operations transparency.
Policies, regulations, and laws need to be updated. Contracting professionals need to learn new skills. IT security and privacy controls need to be adapted to protect confidential and proprietary information. Most of all, the people — the contracting officers, the project managers, the lawyers, the marketers, the proposal writers, and the IT specialists — need to stop talking about how difficult it is to do business with the government and instead focus on asking, “What makes this process so complex and what can I do to make it better?”
)
)
)
Posts
